Title |
The 2016 Kumamoto–Oita earthquake sequence: aftershock seismicity gap and dynamic triggering in volcanic areas
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40623-016-0556-4 |
Authors |
Takahiko Uchide, Haruo Horikawa, Misato Nakai, Reiken Matsushita, Norio Shigematsu, Ryosuke Ando, Kazutoshi Imanishi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 25% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 29% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 71% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2016.
All research outputs
#16,579,551
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,062
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,761
of 311,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.