| Title |
Comparison between a dual-time-window protocol and other simplified protocols for dynamic total-body 18F-FDG PET imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EJNMMI Physics, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40658-022-00492-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhenguo Wang, Yaping Wu, Xiaochen Li, Yan Bai, Hongzhao Chen, Jie Ding, Chushu Shen, Zhanli Hu, Dong Liang, Xin Liu, Hairong Zheng, Yongfeng Yang, Yun Zhou, Meiyun Wang, Tao Sun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Energy | 1 | 11% |
| Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,712,362
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Physics
#78
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,184
of 435,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Physics
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.