↓ Skip to main content

Dominant periods of the 2004 Sumatra tsunami and the estimated source size

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Dominant periods of the 2004 Sumatra tsunami and the estimated source size
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, February 2006
DOI 10.1186/bf03353381
Authors

Kuniaki Abe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 56%
Engineering 4 22%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Philosophy 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#517
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,862
of 91,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.