| Title |
The role of natural science collections in the biomonitoring of environmental contaminants in apex predators in support of the EU’s zero pollution ambition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12302-022-00670-8 |
| Authors |
Paola Movalli, Jan Koschorreck, Gabriele Treu, Jaroslav Slobodnik, Nikiforos Alygizakis, Andreas Androulakakis, Alexander Badry, Emanuel Baltag, Fausto Barbagli, Kevin Bauer, Koos Biesmeijer, Enrico Borgo, Alessandra Cincinelli, Daniela Claßen, Sara Danielsson, René W. R. J. Dekker, Rune Dietz, Marcel Eens, Silvia Espín, Igor Eulaers, Sylke Frahnert, Tibor I. Fuiz, Antonio J. García-Fernández, Jérôme Fuchs, Georgios Gkotsis, Natalia Glowacka, Pilar Gómez-Ramírez, Marco Grotti, Peter A. Hosner, Ulf Johansson, Veerle L. B. Jaspers, Dimitris Koureas, Oliver Krone, Eero Kubin, Christine Lefevre, Madis Leivits, Sabrina Lo Brutto, Ricardo Jorge Lopes, Rui Lourenço, Petros Lymberakis, Knut Madslien, Tania Martellini, Rafael Mateo, Maria-Christina Nika, Dan Osborn, Peter Oswald, Olivier Pauwels, MGlória Pereira, Francesco Pezzo, Pablo Sánchez-Virosta, Nermina Sarajlić, Richard F. Shore, Francisco Soler, Christian Sonne, Nikolaos Thomaidis, Till Töpfer, Risto Väinölä, Nico van den Brink, Al Vrezec, Lee Walker, Stephan Weigl, Chris Wernham, Friederike Woog, Irene Zorrilla, Guy Duke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#366
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,394
of 434,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.