↓ Skip to main content

Incongruences of Ethical and Legal Norms in Academia: the Case on Revocation of Doctoral Degrees

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Academic Ethics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Incongruences of Ethical and Legal Norms in Academia: the Case on Revocation of Doctoral Degrees
Published in
Journal of Academic Ethics, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10805-016-9270-x
Authors

Loreta Tauginienė, Vaidas Jurkevičius

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,296,238
of 9,722,954 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Academic Ethics
#35
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,792
of 245,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Academic Ethics
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,722,954 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 55th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.