The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Defining Contact at the Atomic Scale
|
---|---|
Published in |
Tribology Letters, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11249-010-9682-5 |
Authors |
Shengfeng Cheng, Mark O. Robbins |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
Italy | 2 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 47% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Professor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 20 | 25% |
Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 25% |
Materials Science | 17 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2010.
All research outputs
#3,650,915
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Tribology Letters
#28
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,461
of 94,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tribology Letters
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them