| Title |
Single-incision laparoscopic antrectomy for type I gastric neuroendocrine tumor: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Case Reports, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40792-021-01109-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junya Kitadani, Toshiyasu Ojima, Keiji Hayata, Masahiro Katsuda, Shinta Tominaga, Naoki Fukuda, Hideki Motobayashi, Shotaro Nagano, Masaki Nakamura, Hiroki Yamaue |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,082,891
of 24,261,860 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#30
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,186
of 513,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,261,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.