Title |
Design, synthesis, and degradation studies of new enzymatically erodible Poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate)/poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogels
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biointerphases, November 2007
|
DOI | 10.1116/1.2799034 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nawel S. Khelfallah, Gero Decher, Philippe J. Mésini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 33% |
Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 5 | 33% |
Materials Science | 4 | 27% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,187,876
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Biointerphases
#155
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,299
of 80,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biointerphases
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them