| Title |
Multiple-site decontamination regimen decreases acquired infection incidence in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01057-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Massart, Florian Reizine, Pierre Fillatre, Philippe Seguin, Béatrice La Combe, Aurélien Frerou, Pierre-Yves Egreteau, Baptiste Hourmant, Pierre Kergoat, Julien Lorber, Jerome Souchard, Emmanuel Canet, Guillaume Rieul, Yannick Fedun, Agathe Delbove, Christophe Camus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,825,488
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#444
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,729
of 432,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.