↓ Skip to main content

Application of nonparametric item response theory in determining the one-dimensionality and adaptability of TOEFL iBT listening test

Overview of attention for article published in Language Testing in Asia, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Application of nonparametric item response theory in determining the one-dimensionality and adaptability of TOEFL iBT listening test
Published in
Language Testing in Asia, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40468-022-00171-8
Authors

Hamed Ghaemi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 2 33%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,125,896
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Language Testing in Asia
#126
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,263
of 433,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Testing in Asia
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.