↓ Skip to main content

Controlling the lodging risk of rice based on a plant height dynamic model

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Controlling the lodging risk of rice based on a plant height dynamic model
Published in
Botanical Studies, August 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40529-022-00356-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dong-Hong Wu, Chung-Tse Chen, Ming-Der Yang, Yi-Chien Wu, Chia-Yu Lin, Ming-Hsin Lai, Chin-Ying Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Researcher 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 19 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 13%
Engineering 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 20 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#120
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,129
of 429,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.