| Title |
Effects of foot progression angle on kinematics and kinetics of a cutting movement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40634-022-00447-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kohei Nishizawa, Takeshi Hashimoto, Satoshi Hakukawa, Takeo Nagura, Toshiro Otani, Kengo Harato |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Luxembourg | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 22 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,431,570
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#140
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,264
of 504,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.