| Title |
Use of dexmedetomidine in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01052-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ting Zhang, Qimin Mei, Shabai Dai, Yecheng Liu, Huadong Zhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 24 | 23% |
| Colombia | 6 | 6% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 2 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 56 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#499,352
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#47
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,635
of 431,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.