↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Physics, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT
Published in
EJNMMI Physics, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40658-022-00480-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malte Jensen, Simon Bentsen, Andreas Clemmensen, Jacob Kildevang Jensen, Johanne Madsen, Jonas Rossing, Anna Laier, Philip Hasbak, Andreas Kjaer, Rasmus Sejersten Ripa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Physics and Astronomy 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#18,222,036
of 22,557,175 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Physics
#108
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,829
of 340,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Physics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,557,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them