↓ Skip to main content

Congenital prosopagnosia: multistage anatomical and functional deficits in face processing circuitry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Congenital prosopagnosia: multistage anatomical and functional deficits in face processing circuitry
Published in
Journal of Neurology, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00415-010-5828-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. Dinkelacker, M. Grüter, P. Klaver, T. Grüter, K. Specht, S. Weis, I. Kennerknecht, C. E. Elger, G. Fernandez

Abstract

Face recognition is a primary social skill which depends on a distributed neural network. A pronounced face recognition deficit in the absence of any lesion is seen in congenital prosopagnosia. This study investigating 24 congenital prosopagnosic subjects and 25 control subjects aims at elucidating its neural basis with fMRI and voxel-based morphometry. We found a comprehensive behavioral pattern, an impairment in visual recognition for faces and buildings that spared long-term memory for faces with negative valence. Anatomical analysis revealed diminished gray matter density in the bilateral lingual gyrus, the right middle temporal gyrus, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In most of these areas, gray matter density correlated with memory success. Decreased functional activation was found in the left fusiform gyrus, a crucial area for face processing, and in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas activation of the medial prefrontal cortex was enhanced. Hence, our data lend strength to the hypothesis that congenital prosopagnosia is explained by network dysfunction and suggest that anatomic curtailing of visual processing in the lingual gyrus plays a substantial role. The dysfunctional circuitry further encompasses the fusiform gyrus and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which may contribute to their difficulties in long-term memory for complex visual information. Despite their deficits in face identity recognition, processing of emotion related information is preserved and possibly mediated by the medial prefrontal cortex. Congenital prosopagnosia may, therefore, be a blueprint of differential curtailing in networks of visual cognition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Germany 2 2%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 90 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor 9 9%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 43%
Neuroscience 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,924,576
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#623
of 4,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,828
of 180,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.