↓ Skip to main content

Multimodal Pressure-Flow Analysis: Application of Hilbert Huang Transform in Cerebral Blood Flow Regulation

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Multimodal Pressure-Flow Analysis: Application of Hilbert Huang Transform in Cerebral Blood Flow Regulation
Published in
ADS, May 2008
DOI 10.1155/2008/785243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Men-Tzung Lo, Kun Hu, Yanhui Liu, C.-K. Peng, Vera Novak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Computer Science 4 9%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Mathematics 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,327
of 25,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,120
of 87,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#20
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.