Title |
A systematic review of radiomics in pancreatitis: applying the evidence level rating tool for promoting clinical transferability
|
---|---|
Published in |
Insights into Imaging, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13244-022-01279-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jingyu Zhong, Yangfan Hu, Yue Xing, Xiang Ge, Defang Ding, Huan Zhang, Weiwu Yao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Computer Science | 2 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#14,508,511
of 24,344,498 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#588
of 1,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,334
of 420,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#20
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,344,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.