Title |
The novel epiligament theory: differences in healing failure between the medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40634-021-00440-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Georgi P. Georgiev, Manasi Telang, Boycho Landzhov, Łukasz Olewnik, Svetoslav A. Slavchev, Robert F. LaPrade, Kacper Ruzik, R. Shane Tubbs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Luxembourg | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 76% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 76% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,362,166
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#139
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,874
of 507,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.