@DrBARAndrews Agree! Walton's books and papers interesting. https://t.co/Mv37Ueo6PF
@mathswithdavid @MrBlachford @honeypisquared You can even say it’s ad hominem. Certainly had heated debates about this, cos the grey area is indeed this credibility. Ad hominem scan be justified, I referred to Walton in the past https://t.co/jGK87w5FGr or
Sometimes the latent cause _is_ a hominem* I am aware this is probably not grammatical Latin. https://t.co/pRCtZdw5Cs
RT @peterdalle: @statsepi @VariabilityBlog It's funny because the research on fallacious reasoning points out that ad hominem is sometimes…
@statsepi @VariabilityBlog It's funny because the research on fallacious reasoning points out that ad hominem is sometimes a legitimate and reasonable argument. A ban on ad hominem is contrary to research on ad hominem, which is even funnier when you think
@Skeptical_John @oldandrewuk In https://t.co/jGK87w5FGr smokers also make appearance, also depends on type of dialogue.
@oldandrewuk https://t.co/jGK87w5FGr is interesting on this.
@RLSethics @sputniksteve Good thread! Walton has written good philosophical things on Ad Hom eg https://t.co/zHHV4gglDM
@viewthrudifeyes @nancygedge @jelmerevers For another interesting source on Ad hominems, for example, see Walton https://t.co/jGK87w5FGr