| Title |
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory A. Aarons, Michael Hurlburt, Sarah McCue Horwitz |
| Abstract |
Implementation science is a quickly growing discipline. Lessons learned from business and medical settings are being applied but it is unclear how well they translate to settings with different historical origins and customs (e.g., public mental health, social service, alcohol/drug sectors). The purpose of this paper is to propose a multi-level, four phase model of the implementation process (i.e., Exploration, Adoption/Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment), derived from extant literature, and apply it to public sector services. We highlight features of the model likely to be particularly important in each phase, while considering the outer and inner contexts (i.e., levels) of public sector service systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Singapore | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,892 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1842 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 308 | 16% |
| Researcher | 288 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 283 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 185 | 10% |
| Other | 75 | 4% |
| Other | 348 | 18% |
| Unknown | 405 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 379 | 20% |
| Psychology | 337 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 231 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 149 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 81 | 4% |
| Other | 231 | 12% |
| Unknown | 484 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,263,280
of 25,890,819 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#36
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,986
of 193,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,890,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them