| Title |
Chemical studies of Chinese coinage II: from Qin to Yuan (221 BCE–1368 CE)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heritage Science, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40494-021-00530-3 |
| Authors |
A. M. Pollard, Ruiliang Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 2 | 50% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,074,699
of 24,242,692 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#234
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,111
of 436,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,242,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.