| Title |
Long-term outcomes in patients who received veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and renal replacement therapy: a retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01046-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nuttha Lumlertgul, Rebeka Wright, Gareth Hutson, Jovana Kusic Milicevic, Georgios Vlachopanos, Ken Cheah Hooi Lee, Leah Pirondini, John Gregson, Barnaby Sanderson, Richard Leach, Luigi Camporota, Nicholas A. Barrett, Marlies Ostermann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 33% |
| Japan | 2 | 22% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 29% |
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,021,616
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#392
of 1,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,558
of 425,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.