| Title |
Implementation of Whole-Body MRI (MY-RADS) within the OPTIMUM/MUKnine multi-centre clinical trial for patients with myeloma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-022-01253-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mihaela Rata, Matthew Blackledge, Erica Scurr, Jessica Winfield, Dow-Mu Koh, Alina Dragan, Antonio Candito, Alexander King, Winston Rennie, Suchi Gaba, Priya Suresh, Paul Malcolm, Amy Davis, Anjumara Nilak, Aarti Shah, Sanjay Gandhi, Mauro Albrizio, Arnold Drury, Sadie Roberts, Matthew Jenner, Sarah Brown, Martin Kaiser, Christina Messiou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,267,213
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#271
of 1,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,010
of 426,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.