↓ Skip to main content

Impact of mask use on face recognition: an eye-tracking study

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Impact of mask use on face recognition: an eye-tracking study
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41235-022-00382-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Hui-wen Hsiao, Weiyan Liao, Ricky Van Yip Tso

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 22%
Computer Science 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#867,816
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#53
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,958
of 440,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.