| Title |
Radiographic vs. MRI vs. arthroscopic assessment and grading of knee osteoarthritis ‐ are we using appropriate imaging?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40634-021-00442-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel Newman, Huzefah Ahmed, Nader Rehmatullah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,024,358
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#72
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,912
of 506,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.