↓ Skip to main content

Practical significance of item misfit and its manifestations in constructs assessed in large-scale studies

Overview of attention for article published in Large-scale Assessments in Education, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Practical significance of item misfit and its manifestations in constructs assessed in large-scale studies
Published in
Large-scale Assessments in Education, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40536-022-00124-w
Authors

Katharina Fährmann, Carmen Köhler, Johannes Hartig, Jörg-Henrik Heine

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2022.
All research outputs
#18,443,697
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Large-scale Assessments in Education
#126
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,862
of 433,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Large-scale Assessments in Education
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.