↓ Skip to main content

Effective cleaning of copper stained calcareous stone

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Effective cleaning of copper stained calcareous stone
Published in
Heritage Science, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40494-016-0102-5
Authors

Sanne Spile, Takayoshi Suzuki, Jesper Bendix, Kim Pilkjær Simonsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Materials Science 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,761,985
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#266
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,876
of 315,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.