| Title |
Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-1-50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Leroy, Fabien Lambiotte, Didier Thévenin, Christian Lemaire, Erika Parmentier, Patrick Devos, Olivier Leroy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 134 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 33 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 60% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,518,065
of 23,978,545 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#320
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,970
of 246,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.