| Title |
Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-022-00459-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan T. P. Patel, Eduardo J. Goenaga-Diaz, Magan R. Lane, M. Austin Johnson, Lucas P. Neff, Timothy K. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,434,814
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#147
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,308
of 436,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.