| Title |
Promoting the use of the PRECISE score for prostate MRI during active surveillance: results from the ESOR Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis teaching fellowship
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-022-01252-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Giganti, Laurene Aupin, Camille Thoumin, Ingrid Faouzi, Hippolyte Monnier, Matthieu Fontaine, Alexandre Navidi, Paul-Gydéon Ritvo, Valentin Ong, Cecile Chung, Imen Bibi, Raphaële Lehrer, Nicolas Hermieu, Eric Barret, Alessandro Ambrosi, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Mark Emberton, Clare Allen, Alex Kirkham, Caroline M. Moore, Raphaële Renard-Penna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Comoros | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 18% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 12% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,870,347
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#295
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,764
of 424,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.