↓ Skip to main content

Regional assessment of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, impacts in forests of the Eastern United States

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Regional assessment of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, impacts in forests of the Eastern United States
Published in
Biological Invasions, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1296-x
Authors

Randall S. Morin, Andrew M. Liebhold, Scott A. Pugh, Susan J. Crocker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Unspecified 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 38%
Environmental Science 16 36%
Unspecified 7 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,648,910
of 12,317,848 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#769
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,101
of 267,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#36
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,317,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.