↓ Skip to main content

Is treatment with a high flow nasal cannula effective in acute viral bronchiolitis? A physiologic study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Is treatment with a high flow nasal cannula effective in acute viral bronchiolitis? A physiologic study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-2879-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christophe Milési, Julien Baleine, Stefan Matecki, Sabine Durand, Clémentine Combes, Aline Rideau Batista Novais, Gilles Combonie

Abstract

The high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has recently been proposed to support infants with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related respiratory distress. However, in this disease, no physiologic data are currently available on the effects of this device. We assessed the capacity of HFNC to generate positive airway pressure, as well as the resulting effects on breathing pattern and respiratory effort.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 179 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 31 17%
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Postgraduate 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 61 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 73%
Unspecified 21 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Engineering 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 4 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,590,980
of 13,171,980 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,408
of 3,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,525
of 172,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#31
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,171,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.