↓ Skip to main content

Effects of missing teeth and nasal septal deviation on maxillary sinus volume: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Implant Dentistry, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Effects of missing teeth and nasal septal deviation on maxillary sinus volume: a pilot study
Published in
International Journal of Implant Dentistry, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40729-022-00415-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kikue Yamaguchi, Motohiro Munakata, Yu Kataoka, Takashi Uesugi, Yoshiaki Shimoo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 8 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,251,039
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#72
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,056
of 435,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.