↓ Skip to main content

Achilles and Patellar Tendinopathy Loading Programmes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
417 X users
facebook
21 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1248 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Achilles and Patellar Tendinopathy Loading Programmes
Published in
Sports Medicine, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0019-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Malliaras, Christian J. Barton, Neil D. Reeves, Henning Langberg

Abstract

Achilles and patellar tendinopathy are overuse injuries that are common among athletes. Isolated eccentric muscle training has become the dominant conservative management strategy for Achilles and patellar tendinopathy but, in some cases, up to 45 % of patients may not respond. Eccentric-concentric progressing to eccentric (Silbernagel combined) and eccentric-concentric isotonic (heavy-slow resistance; HSR) loading have also been investigated. In order for clinicians to make informed decisions, they need to be aware of the loading options and comparative evidence. The mechanisms of loading also need to be elucidated in order to focus treatment to patient deficits and refine loading programmes in future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 417 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1229 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 235 19%
Student > Bachelor 211 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 114 9%
Other 101 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 7%
Other 247 20%
Unknown 247 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 325 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 288 23%
Sports and Recreations 232 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 2%
Social Sciences 16 1%
Other 62 5%
Unknown 298 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 294. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#122,329
of 25,930,027 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#108
of 2,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#676
of 211,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.