The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Comparison of ICD-10R, DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 in an Adult Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnostic Clinic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-013-1799-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Ellie Wilson, Nicola Gillan, Deborah Spain, Dene Robertson, Gedeon Roberts, Clodagh M. Murphy, Stefanos Maltezos, Janneke Zinkstok, Katie Johnston, Christina Dardani, Chris Ohlsen, P. Quinton Deeley, Michael Craig, Maria A. Mendez, Francesca Happé, Declan G. M. Murphy |
| Abstract |
An Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis is often used to access services. We investigated whether ASD diagnostic outcome varied when DSM-5 was used compared to ICD-10R and DSM-IV-TR in a clinical sample of 150 intellectually able adults. Of those diagnosed with an ASD using ICD-10R, 56 % met DSM-5 ASD criteria. A further 19 % met DSM-5 (draft) criteria for Social Communication Disorder. Of those diagnosed with Autistic Disorder/Asperger Syndrome on DSM-IV-TR, 78 % met DSM-5 ASD criteria. Sensitivity of DSM-5 was significantly increased by reducing the number of criteria required for a DSM-5 diagnosis, or by rating 'uncertain' criteria as 'present', without sacrificing specificity. Reduced rates of ASD diagnosis may mean some ASD individuals will be unable to access clinical services. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 20% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 88 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,225,272
of 26,512,081 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#436
of 5,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,660
of 212,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#6
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,512,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.