↓ Skip to main content

Medicine in the early twenty-first century: paradigm and anticipation - EPMA position paper 2016

Overview of attention for article published in The EPMA Journal, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Medicine in the early twenty-first century: paradigm and anticipation - EPMA position paper 2016
Published in
The EPMA Journal, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13167-016-0072-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga Golubnitschaja, Babak Baban, Giovanni Boniolo, Wei Wang, Rostyslav Bubnov, Marko Kapalla, Kurt Krapfenbauer, Mahmood S. Mozaffari, Vincenzo Costigliola

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Unspecified 8 18%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 12 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 11 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,383,099
of 12,486,000 outputs
Outputs from The EPMA Journal
#52
of 190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,398
of 282,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The EPMA Journal
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,486,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.