| Title |
Stepping into the real world: a mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of electronic patient reported outcomes in routine lung cancer care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-022-00475-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Afaf Girgis, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Orlando Rincones, Shalini K. Vinod, Sandra Avery, Joseph Descallar, Allan ‘Ben’ Smith, Belinda Arnold, Anthony Arnold, Victoria Bray, Ivana Durcinoska, Nicole M. Rankin, Geoff P. Delaney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,610,266
of 24,452,844 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#64
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,957
of 432,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,452,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.