↓ Skip to main content

Unconscious learning processes: mental integration of verbal and pictorial instructional materials

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Unconscious learning processes: mental integration of verbal and pictorial instructional materials
Published in
SpringerPlus, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seffetullah Kuldas, Hairul Nizam Ismail, Shahabuddin Hashim, Zainudin Abu Bakar

Abstract

This review aims to provide an insight into human learning processes by examining the role of cognitive and emotional unconscious processing in mentally integrating visual and verbal instructional materials. Reviewed literature shows that conscious mental integration does not happen all the time, nor does it necessarily result in optimal learning. Students of all ages and levels of experience cannot always have conscious awareness, control, and the intention to learn or promptly and continually organize perceptual, cognitive, and emotional processes of learning. This review suggests considering the role of unconscious learning processes to enhance the understanding of how students form or activate mental associations between verbal and pictorial information. The understanding would assist in presenting students with spatially-integrated verbal and pictorial instructional materials as a way of facilitating mental integration and improving teaching and learning performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 20%
Social Sciences 17 17%
Arts and Humanities 8 8%
Linguistics 6 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,904,520
of 25,199,971 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#94
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,744
of 201,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#6
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.