↓ Skip to main content

Process institutionalism: toward an action-centric approach to state extraction

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Chinese Sociology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Process institutionalism: toward an action-centric approach to state extraction
Published in
The Journal of Chinese Sociology, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40711-022-00162-5
Authors

Zetao Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 80%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#18,995,998
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#62
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,947
of 442,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them