| Title |
Physiological effects of high-intensity versus low-intensity noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01018-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zujin Luo, Zhixin Cao, Yichong Li, Jiawei Jin, Wei Sun, Jian Zhu, Na Zhao, Jichen Liu, Bing Wei, Yue Hu, Ying Zhang, Yingmin Ma, Chen Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,961,455
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#440
of 1,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,298
of 437,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.