Title |
Respiratory system mechanics in one-lung ventilation using double-lumen tubes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40635-022-00450-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jakob Wittenstein, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Robert Huhle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 1 | 17% |
Ireland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,812,172
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#154
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,238
of 439,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.