| Title |
The frailty, outcomes, recovery and care steps of critically ill patients (FORECAST) study: pilot study results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-022-00446-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Muscedere, Sean M. Bagshaw, Gordon Boyd, Stephanie Sibley, Patrick Norman, Andrew Day, Miranda Hunt, Darryl Rolfson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 23% |
| Canada | 4 | 11% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,844,928
of 24,318,236 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#49
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,270
of 433,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,318,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.