Title |
Comparison between the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method and the Metropolis–Hastings method for coseismic fault model estimation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40623-022-01645-y |
Authors |
Taisuke Yamada, Keitaro Ohno, Yusaku Ohta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,242,502
of 25,516,314 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#474
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,054
of 448,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#20
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,516,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.