@bmwiernik @tcarpenter216 “One item with five response options has 5 possible IRT scores (51 = 5), two items have 25 possible IRT scores (52 = 25) and three items have 125 possible IRT scores (53 = 125). This is a large increase in score resolution over ra
RT @dpeipert: Nice paper by @Rchapman_Rsrch reviewing @promisNIH scoring in a very accessible way! Should be very useful to a large audienc…
RT @dpeipert: Nice paper by @Rchapman_Rsrch reviewing @promisNIH scoring in a very accessible way! Should be very useful to a large audienc…
Nice paper by @Rchapman_Rsrch reviewing @promisNIH scoring in a very accessible way! Should be very useful to a large audience interested in PROMIS!
RT @JPRO_ISOQOL: Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS® https://t.co/6mlSmIIkqn
Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS® https://t.co/6mlSmIIkqn
In sum, deeply proud to be married to this guy & can't wait to see what he does at University of Minnesota Paper here: https://t.co/ETQh4QDisy
RT @Rchapman_Rsrch: 📢PROMIS scoring manuscript is now published in JPRO! https://t.co/EJCl7TZ5vH @promisNIH #patientreportedoutcomes @JPRO…
📢PROMIS scoring manuscript is now published in JPRO! https://t.co/EJCl7TZ5vH @promisNIH #patientreportedoutcomes @JPRO_ISOQOL @ISOQOL #impsci