↓ Skip to main content

A Bayesian track-before-detect procedure for passive radars

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
A Bayesian track-before-detect procedure for passive radars
Published in
ADS, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1687-6180-2013-45
Authors

Khalil Jishy, Frederic Lehmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 36%
Materials Science 2 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#24,240
of 25,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,253
of 208,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#552
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.