| Title |
A living tool for the continued exploration of microplastic toxicity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microplastics and Nanoplastics, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43591-022-00032-4 |
| Authors |
Leah M. Thornton Hampton, Heili Lowman, Scott Coffin, Emily Darin, Hannah De Frond, Ludovic Hermabessiere, Ezra Miller, Vera N. de Ruijter, Andrea Faltynkova, Syd Kotar, Laura Monclús, Samreen Siddiqui, Johannes Völker, Susanne Brander, Albert A. Koelmans, Chelsea M. Rochman, Martin Wagner, Alvine C. Mehinto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 20% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 57% |
| Scientists | 35 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#703,153
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from Microplastics and Nanoplastics
#12
of 61 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,360
of 445,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microplastics and Nanoplastics
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.