| Title |
Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish central sensitization inventory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40064-016-3515-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas, Cristina Roldan-Jimenez, Randy Neblett, Robert J. Gatchel |
| Abstract |
The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is a new patient-reported instrument, which measures symptoms related to Central Sensitivity Syndromes and Central Sensitization. The aim of this study was to translate the CSI into Spanish, and then to perform a psychometric validation, including a factor analysis to reveal the underlying structure. In this two-stage psychometric study participated 395 subjects with various chronic pain conditions and that were recruited from two Primary Care Centres. The CSI was cross-culturally adapted to Spanish through double forward and backward translations. The psychometric properties were then evaluated with analyses of construct validity, factor structure and internal consistency. One subgroup (n = 45) determined test-retest reliability at 7 days. The Spanish Version of CSI demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.872) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.91). Factor structure was one-dimensional and supported construct validity. The psychometric properties of the Spanish version were found to be strong, with high test-retest reliability and internal consistency, with similar psychometric properties to the English language version. Unlike the English version, however, a one factor solution was found to be a best fit for the Spanish version. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 35% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 270 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 74 | 27% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 5% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 80 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,037,996
of 23,860,197 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#115
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,889
of 318,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#14
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,860,197 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.