| Title |
Ethical reflections on end-of-life signs and symptoms in the intensive care setting: a place for neuromuscular blockers?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-4-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cédric Daubin, Lise Haddad, Dominique Folscheid, Alexandre Boyer, Ludivine Chalumeau-Lemoine, Olivier Guisset, Philippe Hubert, Jérôme Pillot, René Robert, Didier Dreyfuss |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Energy | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#657
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,828
of 227,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.