↓ Skip to main content

The science behind the development and performance of reduced ignition propensity cigarettes

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Science Reviews, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
The science behind the development and performance of reduced ignition propensity cigarettes
Published in
Fire Science Reviews, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40038-016-0011-4
Authors

Richard R Baker, Steven Coburn, Chuan Liu, Kevin G. McAdam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 33%
Chemistry 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,810,584
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Fire Science Reviews
#18
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,943
of 300,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Science Reviews
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.