↓ Skip to main content

GraphZIP: a clique-based sparse graph compression method

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Big Data, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
GraphZIP: a clique-based sparse graph compression method
Published in
Journal of Big Data, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40537-018-0121-z
Authors

Ryan A. Rossi, Rong Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 46%
Engineering 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,687,628
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Big Data
#208
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,149
of 332,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Big Data
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.